Sunday, December 8, 2019

Wedding Talk, Part Three: Being an Ally


Wedding Talk, Part Three: Being an Ally
Our pastor was from the Open Table Metropolitan Community Church in Manila, a group that focuses on LGBT outreach and advocacy, and normally does LGBT, non-legally-binding weddings for them. Many of our entourage were openly LGBT. Our wedding itself was between the two of us from different nationalities and races. There certainly was a theme of openness and acceptance, and something I feel is worth talking a bit about.



A Matter of Convenience
Development work has a large number of people who belong to not-privileged demographics, both on the professionals’ side and the recipients as well. As such, we’ve met many friends, developed a “tribe”, “extended family”, whatever term we want to use, that face social stigma and challenges that we don’t. Choosing Open Table was less of a bold, daring political stand, and more of trying to find a group that would be accommodating to our guests. We didn’t want someone who’d overemphasize “one man and one woman” or “only through Jesus Christ” when both comments however well-intended wouldn’t apply to everyone we care about.

It was convenience.

For me, this is part of being an ally, where it’s less about some great sacrifice on behalf of others, and more realizing that kindness and inclusion makes all of our lives a little bit better. It’s not just “their” fight, it’s “our” fight, their happiness and well-being a complement, not a deterrent, to ours.

Balancing Humility and Pride
There were a few people who after the wedding expressed some truly genuine thanks to us, for feeling safe and welcome. One person achieved a life goal of being a flower girl. On one hand it did fill me with pride to be a part of that, for our wedding to mean so much to others in this way. On the other hand, it didn’t feel like much, that what we did paled in comparison to the struggles they’ve had.

It’s both.

We all see the world with varying degrees of weight. What is important or difficult or frightening for one person is casual or easy or simple to another. Part of being an ally is being aware of this, that many of the things we take for granted, actions and thoughts that may take little to no effort, can be what matters most for other people. It is accepting that effort and outcome are not always perfectly aligned and that just as we can fight hard and make little ground, so too can we just say something nice and push the needle forward.

A Journey, not a Destination
Just as our wedding was one step along Tin and my story together, so too was the wedding in regards to being an ally. We did something good, we did something progressive and thoughtful, but it isn’t some sort of victory lap where we can now declare we’re done. Our inclusion was based on experiences and friendships that have grown over years, and we’ll continue to grow as people and professionals to continue the good work.

It doesn’t end.

One thing I do understand from skeptics is the common reaction of how tired they are over “PC culture”, and having to second guess everything they do and say. My response is usually along the lines of, “Well… yeah. It is tiring, and it can be a lot to think about, but that’s the point.” People who aren’t accepted by society have that weight on their shoulders constantly, and I can only imagine it’s even harder than whatever challenge those of us more accepting have trying to be more actively aware and mindful.

-

Concluding Thoughts
I don’t feel that life has changed all that much. Wearing a wedding band is new, and I’m getting a hang of what things I can do with it on, and when I should take it off. Then again, Tin won’t be moving in until January, so that part of our new life is still to come.

Coming full circle, it all boils down to choice, to perception. Are we champions for the underserved, or just people trying to figure things out ourselves? Were the trips and stumbles things we can smile about or cringe about in hindsight? As we move forward, will our wedding serve as an important time we fall back on, or will it fade away in exchange for more recent memories? There’s truth in all our options, and we’ll choose which truth to live by one day at a time.



Sunday, November 17, 2019

Wedding Talk, Part Two: Moments


Wedding Talk, Part Two: Moments

This post is more of something for posterity, a chance to list out some fun, defining, and meaningful moments while it’s all still fresh in my head, something to go back to years from now so I don’t have to remember it all from scratch.

Days leading up to the wedding
-Getting to see Peace Corps staff again at a training: There was a time I knew every Peace Corps volunteer in the Philippines, but that time is well passed. Instead, it’s the staff who remain who I have shared memories with, fun people who work to help their country by helping guide/put up with American shenanigans.
-Seeing my supervisor again: Although Nerio, his wife Remi, and the rest of his family couldn’t make the wedding, getting to spend lunch with him, and then do a video call with his kids (as he always says, his two girls, and his two daughters making four total) was a good reminder of my weekends during service, spending time with my family in Nueva Vizcaya.
-Tin’s graduation: Getting to be a part of Tin’s graduation, seeing her hard work over three years pay off was a great time. Admittedly, I also was reminded of guest speakers making long, unrelated speeches.
-Tin’s surprise bridal shower: Tin volunteers with a barangay every Saturday, and she is also very hard to surprise. Still, they managed it with decorations, food, and cheers.
-Introducing my family to the Philippines: My dad had been to the Philippines once briefly, but my mom and sister hadn’t, and so I got to introduce them to the country of my Peace Corps service. Of particular joy was seeing them all scrunched up in a trike.
-Pamamanhikan: The traditional meeting of the families, the awkwardness lasted only a few minutes and then everyone started getting to know each other.

Before the Wedding
-The Rehearsal Dinner: Boni and Argy started off the speeches on a strong note, both heartfelt. Getting to see so many people from different parts of our lives all in one place was surreal.
-Filipino Four Loko: There’s an infamous concoction of red horse (strong beer), genebra (gin), and cobra (energy drink) that makes one very drunk, and very happy and excited to drink more. Munya brought it over, Greg asked for seconds, and I (after chugging down lots of water) slept on a wooden sofa on the porch so people could find me easily in the morning in case I slept in.
-Horse thief: Woke up to the sounds of people shouting. I was like, “Huh, those voices sound familiar… nah…” and snoozed again. Turns out a horse tried to snatch our bread for breakfast, thus the shouting.
-Action shot: Watching the photographers try to take a picture of Tin’s wedding dress (not her in the dress, just the dress) by throwing up the veil, and darting out of the camera angle to try to show the veil trailing behind. Must’ve tried it at least a dozen times.
-Moment at the beach: Munya, Greg, my sister, and I just standing at the beach to spend some time to ourselves before the big event, Mt. Mayon in the distance.
-Clouds: It was a hot day, but some clouds (that didn’t rain) that came in helped a lot.
-First glance: That first moment looking at the wedding set up floored me. It was beautiful.
-Whacky: Whacky shots in the Philippines are a thing. At first my own photoshoot was pretty boring until I asked for a whacky photo. The photographers’ eyes lit up and things turned around.

The Wedding
-Starting out: Taking that walk, not feeling the ground beneath my feet.



-The bride: Watching my soon-to-be-wife walk down the aisle, tears in everyone’s eyes, seeing her in the dress she chose that was right for her, right for us.
-A strong call for acceptance: Our pastor works for a group who primarily does church services for the LGBT community. A very softspoken man, Pator Mike came off strong in his ardent support for love for all.
-Help getting up: Tin’s dress was gorgeous, but did need a little help to move to stand up and sit down. When it was suggested for the Maids of Honor to help her out, my best men followed soon to help lift me.
-Our vows: When I asked other people their favorite moments, they said it was our vows. As of writing this, still waiting for the video, which should have our vows on it. Suffice to say, we each spoke from the heart.

-The kiss: That moment that signaled the end of the wedding proper, our first kiss as husband and wife.

After the Wedding
-Lots of sugar: One of the traditions is to have the grandparents give us each a spoonful of sugar. Lola got as much sugar as she could on that spoon, making for quite the mouthful.

-The dance: Our first dance as husband and wife, and then bringing our parents up. My mother-in-law’s words in particular, her hopes for us struck home.

-Funny cake: The bottom layer of the cake was real, the top two were styrofoam covered in frosting. It took both of us with both hands to cut the styrofoam, and whereas I gave her the frosting, I got the non-edible part. I slipped it out of my mouth when eyes were turned away.
-The speeches: From Munya reminding me of the first night I drank that Filipino Four Loko and learning new things about that hazy night myself, to the heartfelt compliments to Tin and my relationship, to my sister discussing our own dynamics growing up, and finally to Ambet quite incorrectly suggesting that Boni and I aren’t funny, the speeches gave us a lot to be proud of, and a lot to look forward to.
-“Congratulations!”: The heat of the day did get to Tin during picture-taking, and as she was queasy, everyone around her couldn’t help but crack pregnant jokes (to be clear we’re not having any children yet).
-“100”: Although we left the festivities early, we could hear Munya’s celebratory shout when he got 100 at videoke.

The Following Days
-Talks: Despite our best efforts, we didn’t get to talk too much to people once the wedding started. That morning we got up early to say goodbye to those heading for a morning flight. For the others we got to sit down and just hang out.
-Instax camera: Stephanie wanted that instax (polaroid) camera really bad, but Brian won it in the end. Their rivalry that morning was fun to watch.
-“Ooh!”: We took a number of the guests with us to Tin’s house. I got a shower, and sort of forgot my new wedding band in the restroom, resulting in a big “ooh!” from everyone.
-Goodbyes: It was bittersweet after so many hello’s, to say as many goodbyes as people had flights and cars to catch.
-ATVs: A group of us rode ATVs through rivers and to the base of the volcano. Although one of our number had an accident, it was overall a fun time with great views.
-Politics, society, and life: A lot of Tin and my relationship is from talking about deep, nuanced topics from the world as well as our own life. It was great talking for hours with Rachel and sharing those conversations with someone else.
-Whale sharks: We did some final touring with my parents and at Legazpi Bay got to see about half-a-dozen whale sharks off the coast.
-A movie and snacks: I watched Maleficient Mistress of Evil with Tin, Stephanie, and their mom, and then after got my snacks to bring back. Mm, mm chili-mansi pancit canton.

-A brief, but full honeymoon: We had our short honeymoon at a place called “Your Brother House”. It was a chance to get away briefly.
-A carrot and giraffe-alligator: Got Tin a carrot and a hybrid alligator-that-turns-into-a-giraffe stuffed toys as a parting gift.
-My car working despite leaving it at the airport parking lot with the “check engine” light on for 18 days.


For part three I’ll talk about being an ally, and some concluding thoughts about our special day.


Saturday, November 2, 2019

Wedding Talk, Part One: Value


Wedding Talk, Part One: Value
As I write this, it’s been about two weeks since my wedding with Tin. The days before, the day of, and the days after were everything I could’ve hoped for and more, with a lot of moments to reflect and learn from.

After trying to figure out how best to split up my many, disparate thoughts into more manageable parts, the first thing that came to mind was the “value” of the wedding, of specifically the event, the ceremony. It’s time, it’s effort, it’s money, weddings are a lot to take on, and aren’t mandatory in this day and age. We could’ve just gotten a legal marriage and be done with it, or keep a celebration to something simple with just a few people.

Perception is Internal
One of the simple wisdoms that’s done a lot of good for me is the awareness that perception happens within our own heads. Our senses (touch, sight, smell, hearing, taste) comes from what’s happening around us, but how we interpret it all is within our control. Warm or hot, pleasant or ugly, delicious or bland, we can choose to look at the glass half full or empty, can even decide how full or empty we make the cups in front of us.

For anyone debating on whether or not to have a formal wedding, my advice is to first ask how much value do you choose to give to the wedding, and secondly what can you do to see as much value as possible. Is the value in the tradition? Is the value in the guests? Is the value in the moment saying, “I do”? The answer will be different for each of us.

For me, it was wonderful getting to see people from different parts of our lives all coming together in the same place. It was great seeing the decisions Tin made that broke from what’s common from her gorgeous blue dress, to the wedding band, to the outdoor venue, to having a non-traditional pastor (more on this in another post) work out so well. It was in getting to see how our special day turned into a special day for others. It was in the affirmation that we’re good people by the words of our family and friends, and the challenge to live up to their hopes for us.



A good shot of Tin’s dress, her band on her left hand, and the outdoor venue behind us.

The Beauty in Imperfection
One thing I can confidently say though is that a wedding is going to have its quirks, its stumbles. I woke up the morning of the wedding on a wooden couch, doing well considering I’d drunken that stupid Filipino version of a Four Loko the night before. There was some antics with some horses trying to eat everyone’s breakfast (not a metaphor). The part of the cake we tried to cut was styrofoam (the actual cake in a different layer). They make for good stories.

We are also imperfect. One thing that came up a couple of times during the speeches was my history of being bad at asking girls out. I mean, on one level it’s pretty clear that any crushes or relationships I had prior to Tin didn’t work out, which gave me the chance to make it work with her. On a more personal level it was a humbling reminder of my past awkwardness, insecurities, and less-than-compelling foot I’d put forward, and that though I can’t say I’m cured of it all, I’ve worked on it and continue to do so. This reminder of my own imperfection once again was not anything that spoiled the day, or tarnished a good time, but made me grateful for where I am now. It was a chance to laugh at myself with everyone else.

For anyone looking for a “perfect day”, I’d say be prepared for something to not go according to plan, and to remember that nothing in our lives is ever without its hurdles so why should a wedding be any different?

This is not the picture of the perfect man who’s conquered all, but is still figuring it out day by day, hour by hour.

Not Just One Day
One warning I will give is that the wedding itself is a difficult time to try to spend with everyone else. Tin and I removed some of the traditions to make for a shorter overall event, to try to spend more of the evening with our guests, but it still ran long. The pictures, the ceremony, more pictures, the reception, and pictures all required our attention, and we really didn’t spend much time with our guests.

We did it before and after.

Spending some days before the wedding to see those people who live close by, and spending a day or two after with those further away, gave us the time to catch up with those we love, to go a couple adventures, to just relax and talk about future plans and socioeconomic issues in the world. When I talk about our wedding, the week before and after are a part of it in my mind, and just as important as the day of the wedding itself.

The day after the wedding, riding ATVs with the volcano in the background.

-

I have a couple more parts planned. The next one will be a list of those genuine, memorable moments. The last one will be my thoughts on being an ally, as that was a very central part of our wedding.





Monday, July 22, 2019

Interests vs. Positions, A Discussion on Negotiation (and Blog Update)


Interests vs. Positions, A Discussion on Negotiation (and Blog Update)

Negotiation: A discussion aimed at reaching an agreement

One thing I’ve covered lightly in other blog posts before is the idea of interests and positions. I was asked if I could elaborate on the concepts. For full transparency, these are concepts I picked up from Getting to Yes by Roger Fisher and William Ury. It’s a great book, and a pretty quick read so I highly recommend it.

We Do Negotiation Wrong
Whether it is scoring points in a debate club, pundits talking about which candidate won off of having the best talking points, or trying to prove ourselves right/the other person wrong, we don’t negotiate in a way that’s effective most of the time. There are no “points” in real life, debates are only one piece of the puzzle for successful campaigns, and most of the time life isn’t so neat and orderly as to give us one winner/correct person and one loser/incorrect person.

The underlying problem is that we treat negotiations as a contest, but if we look at the definition above, a contest is not the best means to accomplish the goal of reaching an agreement. This holds true in the short term in that if all sides of the negotiation are focused on winning, we commonly end up in a situation where no one is willing to lose and nothing is accomplished. This also holds true in the long term in that tallying up who’s won more or not over time creates an expectation of adversity.

How to Find the Interests
It boils down to “WHY”.

WHY does it matter who does a certain chore? Is it a matter of everyone doing their part, or a matter of who does it better, or a matter of some sort of change like a person being busier/stressed/needing some support?

WHY does it matter what color the furniture will be? It is purely what will look better, a question of who is in charge to make decision, concerns about cost?

WHY are we upset by what the other person said? Did we take it personally? Was it something we discussed before? Was it more in how the words were said instead of the actual words?

It is about turning the conversation from who is doing the chores into if we are all contributing, or doing things correctly, or recognizing a life change. With who is doing the chore, there are limited options, a few fixed positions, either Person A or Person B will do it, occasionally both may, or even Person C if they exist. With the three potential interests, there is more flexibility to find common ground, to be creative. If it’s about contributing, maybe someone can help with an alternate chore, or step it up in some other way. If it’s about doing things correctly, maybe the less-talented person can learn and improve. If it’s about a life change, it may just boil down to talking it out and giving emotional support.

Different Interests
What often happens is that we go into a negotiation with very different interests. It’s what can lead to such heated arguments in the first place. One person is talking about principles, while another is trying to talk about tangible effects. Both may very well be right, or at least have good points, but can’t understand each other because they’re fixated on their own interests.

Have both conversations. Talk about the principles AND talk about the tangible effects. Talk about the first as much as needed, then the second, then re-address the first if need be, so on and so forth.

Of course, the differences in interests may be incompatible. Interests give a greater chance to reach an agreement than positions, but it is by no means guaranteed. Even then, talking about interests tends to be less contentious, as it gives us the chance to express ourselves better, helps us understand the other side even if we don’t agree, and there are often some ways to reach a partial agreement if not a full one.

***

Blog Updates and Changes
There’s been a couple life changes since my last blog update.

The first is that I am now an official member of ICMA (International City Manager’s Association). It’s a professional association with its own code of ethics, one of them regarding staying out of politics that undermine public confidence in administrators. As such, so long as I’m a member and following those rules I will refrain from digging into or mentioning partisan politics whether a political party or individual candidate. Anything I’ve posted before will stay up, written when I had no such professional boundary and there’s no need to retroactively go back. After all, anyone who looks at my resume will see I worked for the Obama Campaign in 2008, and just as I won’t cross that off, no need to go back on anything else written before.

Secondly, I’ve started to write blogs for a group called ELGL (Engaging Local Government Leaders), which can be found here: https://elgl.org/. I’ve already contributed a few posts this year, with plans to do my own “series” once I start the next graduate degree come 2020. As such, I’ll probably post less often as I have a new avenue to post my ideas. This blog will still be used for more personal ideas and experiences. Also, one thing I’ve picked up is that blog posts traditionally are 500-1,000 words, which I’ve gone way, way over before. No promises, but will probably practice making future blog posts shorter to keep in line with this. 


Saturday, May 18, 2019

A Talk About my Cross-Cultural Relationship, Part Three (Distance)


A Talk About my Cross-Cultural Relationship, Part Three (Distance)
Originally this was planned to be just one blog post, but after my fiancĂ©e looked it over asked  me to split it into two parts. Then I received a request from someone asking if I could also touch on the long-distance relationship part of it, how we’ve made it work. I admit hearing that both what I wrote was helpful and to receive a request like that is both empowering and troubling. On one hand, it feels good that what I wrote helped someone out. On the other, it is a reminder to continue to be mindful of what I post, that I do have a responsibility for it.

I think one important piece of context is that Tin and I started our relationship on the opposite sides of the world. We started dating October 2015. and didn’t actually have our first date in person until a few months later in January. For us, it wasn’t a matter of figuring out how to adjust our relationship from being together to being apart, but really much the opposite as slowly but surely we’ve been able to be together for longer periods of time.

The Right Sized “Net”
I’ve met people who have no problem with the idea of distance relationships, and others who say they could never do it. I think both are probably right. It’s really about our own individual values and priorities, and what a long-distance relationship means. How important is physical intimacy? How important is it to date in person doing things together? Holidays, good times, bad times, however important it is, however big of a “fish” the challenge is, will depend on the couple. It’s trying to find the balance between not underestimating the challenge, but also not giving more power to the distance than it deserves. It’s finding the right sized “net” for the “fish”.

For Tin and I, I think we started off just fine. When we started dating I had a full-time job and graduate school. I didn’t really have the time to go out a lot even if I wanted to. Tin already had a good social network of friends to hang out with boyfriend or not. Our circumstances, both the good things and the struggles, made it so it wasn’t as big a challenge as it might be for others.

Tools at our Disposal
As I mentioned in Part 1, under Techno-Geographic (made up term), we have a lot of tools at our disposal. Social media, video chats, texting apps, the list goes on and on. It’s not the same, it’s not everything that would be available if we were together, but the tools are there nevertheless.
·       Facebook, Viber, and Skype: These are the three apps/sites we use to talk to each other almost every day. Sometimes one won’t be working well so we have to switch to another. Viber’s more convenient on the phone, Skype on the computer, Facebook somewhere in between.
·       Hobbies: Two of the things we do together while apart were coloring and cooking. We both download and print out the same picture or look up the same recipe and make the meal at the same time. A couple of times we streamed a movie or video at the same time. There’s plenty of other hobbies from weaving baskets, to online games, to reading a book that can be shared at a distance.
·       Stories: “How’d your day go?” or any variation of the question is something that’s let Tin and I talk almost every day for the passed three-years and seven-months. One silver lining as being apart is that we get to retell our day to each other. For the most part, our long-distance relationship was talking about life events, what happened, how we felt, what next. It might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but at least it’s one more tool.

$Money$
Regardless of how much money we have, it is a factor of being in a distance relationship. In particular it’s when to visit, who’s going where, and who’s going to pay. Despite our distance, we’ve been able to see each other about twice a year. As mentioned in the other two parts, this is rarely a fair and balanced situation and is something that can change. A plane ticket between the U.S. and Philippines is certainly more affordable on an average U.S. salary. However, for a span of time I was unemployed while Tin had a well-paying, secure job.

Who has vacation time off? Which partner has an easier time getting to the other person’s country? Where do we want to go? These questions play a large part too, but probably the biggest one is who will pay. It’s not always an easy conversation, but one better figured out sooner than later.

The Choice
We’ve all known the friend in a bad relationship who can’t quite bring themselves to end it. We’ve all known the friend in a good relationship that comes across some sort of hurdle or impasse and struggles to keep it going. A long-distance relationship can certainly fall under either. I think that a lot of times long-distanced relationships are portrayed as disempowering, of not being able to be “there” for the other person, of having restraints we can’t overcome. True or not, one thing we do have power over is the choice, the choice to do all we can to make it work, or the choice to walk away if that’s the right thing for one person or both.

That is probably the bottom line of what made it work between Tin and me, and why we’ll be tying the knot in October. We both chose to stay together. Regardless of the cultural differences, the distance, the everyday challenges any couple faces, we took enough ownership of our relationship. We defined it by things within our control instead of what we couldn’t, and chose to be together.

Sunday, April 14, 2019

A Talk About my Cross-Cultural Relationship, Part Two (The Tips)

A Talk About my Cross-Cultural Relationship, Part Two (The Tips)
Before I posted the first part of this two-part blog post, I did consult with Tin (my fiancĂ©) to make sure what I wrote, though certainly from my perspective, was something she could get behind as well. The one big change she asked for wasn’t to remove or rephrase everything, but to take what was originally some “quick tips”, and expand on them in a part two.

Whereas the first post was meant as a summary of societal and other factors that have shaped our relationship, here’s a list of things that have helped our relationship. It’s not an exhaustive list nor is this any declaration that our relationship is perfect. It’s only things that help brighten our relationship in subtle, small ways, and help us overcome the challenges we face.

1. Cultural Differences can be an Opportunity
If cultural differences are seen as a burden, if we love our partner “in spite” of the cultural differences, it will be difficult. Instead, I’d strongly recommend seeing other cultures in a more open, more accepting way. It can be a learning opportunity, a chance for growth.

It’s easier said than done, and whenever I give the 2-minute elevator pitch about my experience in Peace Corps, I make a point to mention that working with other cultures (and playing by THEIR rules as opposed to our own) can be a humbling, trying experience that makes us feel like a child as we have to relearn some basic assumptions about how things work. I also make a point to say how rewarding an experience it can be, to learn new ways to view ourselves, the world, and life.

One example is learning how my own optimism isn’t so universal as I thought. Was it difficult at first to understand? Sure. Was it annoying realizing perhaps I’m not as positive as I once thought? Definitely. Did it make me more self-aware, better comprehending my own outlook on life and how it can be interpreted? Certainly.

2. Search for the Context
Sometimes there are beliefs, behaviors, perceptions that seem incomprehensible at first glance. Rather than jump to conclusions, look for the context of it as there is almost always an explanation to be found. We all live off of different assumptions and beliefs, across cultures it’s more profound.

It takes a leap of faith though. It is accepting that how we’re perceiving a situation isn’t necessarily right, or at least not fully right. It is coming at the unknown with a sense of genuine curiosity as opposed to disdain, mistrust, or a patronizing smugness. It requires us to step outside our own cultural expectations.

One early thing I had to find context for was when Tin would ask for my permission to go out. We were living on opposite sides of the world, I took the question a bit literally and felt like, “What am I going to do? Take a 24 hour series of plane rides and layovers to stop you from going out this evening?” There was also the discomfort of not wanting to tell a grown woman what she can and can’t do. Machisimo is a bigger thing in the Philippines (not saying it doesn’t exist in the U.S. as well), and past boyfriends of Tin’s really did try to put their foot down whether she’d go out with friends. There was context. There were cultural norms and personal history behind what I didn’t understand, which gave me the knowledge to better say, “All right, I see that this is what’s happened in the past, but that’s not how I am.”

3. Be Constructive, Thoughtful and Non-Judgmental about Criticisms
Be constructive, thoughtful, and non-judgmental about criticisms. Whether we want it or not, we have cultural differences that regardless of our best intentions we won’t like. That’s all right. Just as we each have things we don’t care for within our own respective cultures, so too is it natural to disagree, be offended by, hold criticism for others.

The tricky, but important, part is to be critical in a way that is honest, but not abrasive, that is well-intended, but not arrogant. It is about not liking certain aspects of a culture, but still appreciating the culture and people as a whole.

 As an example, I don’t care for how common it is in the Philippines for people to talk about people being overweight or dark-skinned so openly. This body-shaming is something I grew up learning was rude. It’s not something Tin really does, but it still wouldn’t be good for our relationship if I go overboard though, if I started to claim “Filipinos are racist because they point out people skin tone and have whitening cream!” That comment generalizes all Filipinos, it condemns them, it puts me in a place of moral authority over them. A much better (and accurate) way of speaking about it is more along the lines of, “Where I’m from, we find it insensitive to call out people for physical traits, so it’s something I’m uncomfortable with and don’t really agree with when I see it”. I make it about myself, I explain why, I don’t fully accept the difference, but neither do I go over the top with my criticism.

4. Accept Criticisms in Return
No culture is perfect, and often times there are issues or at least grey areas where we didn’t realize there were with our own society. There are things we take for granted that might be a problem for someone else. Don’t be defensive, but instead be open, listen, ask questions in return to better understand the criticisms offered.

Sometimes it’s easy. It doesn’t really phase me when discussing how in America, we’re not as family-oriented, on average we will put other things first and are more likely to be estranged with cousins, aunts, uncles, more extended family (once again emphasizing on average) than other countries. There are other things though that it’s not as easy, when things we value in our own culture are challenged.

One example is expectations. In America we tend to expect a lot out of service, at least to a degree. Faster transportation, friendly help, quicker lines. The typical American response is when we lack these things to get assertive, frustrated, to consider how it could be better. Although I can certainly agree that the stereotypical entitled American wanted things handed on a silver platter is much, but one thing Tin pointed out to me is even if I keep my cool, even if I accept things mostly, do I really need to think of ways it can be better? Is it not enough to accept the world as it is and move on?

5. Be Considerate of Power-Dynamics
As mentioned in part one, there are different political, economic, techno-geographical, etc. factors at play, and in the end things are rarely fair for couples across cultures. There is usually one nation, country, society that is more dominant. Whether we think it’s right or not, it is a reality that we contend with.

As much as we Americans love our sense of fairness, part of being in a cross-cultural relationship is accepting that there is uneven footing at times. We can always work to find compromises, balance things out, find our middle grounds, but not every issue or decision has a 50/50 option available to us.

It makes logical sense for Tin to, at least for now, look to move to the U.S. permanently once the process and paperwork is done as opposed to me going to the Philippines and live there. Financially and professionally there are more options here for both of us, and that’s not a fair situation. It is Tin sacrificing more, to leave what’s familiar to her behind. However, I want to emphasize “for now” though. Just because it’s logical though doesn’t mean it’s what it has to always be, nor does it lessen what Tin will be doing for our relationship.

6. Communicate, Communicate, Communicate
Never assume you’ve figured it all out, that there’s always something else to learn, teach, and communicate about. Even if we figure out everything there is, there’s always new situations, new environments, new decisions to be made, any of which can be viewed and interpreted in different ways.

There isn’t an end to it. At least, if there’s some sort of light at the end of the tunnel with a pure, perfect understanding we haven’t reached it yet and that’s all right. I imagine that communication is more a part of life, just like eating and breathing it’s something we have to do. Just as we don’t say “Gosh, do I really have to breath air today, as I always do?” it feels almost as absurd to think communication has some sort of end to it.

One thing that came up at the end of last year was my decision to take a second Masters degree. We’d agreed that we would “put the wedding first”, but whereas for me I treated it as a financial scenario, that once we were set in paying for the wedding then I could look into taking classes, Tin saw it as a matter time commitment, to not have a big distraction (which it will be) get in the way. We had to talk it through, figure out where the root of the misunderstanding was, and figure it out.

7. We are Influenced by our Culture. We are not Defined by It.
We do not live in a vacuum, the world around us does impact us regardless of whether we want it to or not. Even if we defy some aspect of our society, that defiance is still a direct reaction to how we’ve been influenced. However, it is those differences, what we choose to adhere to and not, what subtle nuanced ways we live up to, fall short of, and surpass expectations set upon us that we find our individuality.

It becomes a grey area of how much to attribute to an individual and what to say is “cultural”. In many cases the answer can be both or neither. In practice, trying to separate our “true self” and our upbringing end up linked too tight together to neatly categorize.

One way in which Tin stands apart from cultural stereotypes is her intelligence and ambition. She was told more than once that she wouldn’t be able to marry because she’d intimidate men who would either try to drag her down to their level or feel inadequate not being able to keep up. Did it stop Tin from being herself? No, but it did lead to some early conversations in our relationship where I had to assure her I wasn’t going to be intimidated like that, and I’d support her.

8. Engage the Other Culture
Read up on the other culture. Learn about it. Go to the place. Experience it. Although as I stated above things aren’t usually so fair for things to be 50/50, that doesn’t mean that both partners can’t at least make some genuine steps to try things outside their comfort zone (or within their comfort zone too).

Tin and I have the benefit of already engaging in each other’s cultures. I lived in the Philippines as a Peace Corps Volunteer for three years. She worked for the Peace Corps, a US government agency engaging American volunteers daily. It’s gone a long way to help us better understand each other.

We can always do more. I can tune up on my Tagalog (or even Bicol, her regional dialect). There’s more things I can show Tin that are distinctly American. As with other things, it’s not so much about meeting a certain benchmark and then calling it good. It’s about finding new ways to do a little more.

9. Don’t Underestimate the Small Things
A quick lesson from Peace Corps is that most of the time it’s not big, overt differences that can lead to problems but many small things added up. It’s the added weight of speaking a different language, of trying to look for nonverbal cues, for having to do daily tasks in a different way than we’re used to that can leave a Volunteer feeling tired at the end of the day. Volunteers come prepared for dramatic, romanticized differences, not the small stresses from the small things.

It’s the same for a relationship. All those small things like chores, the room’s arrangement, what simple ways to show affection, small things that alone might not make or break things, but with a dozen other similar matters can. Besides, what is small to us might not be for someone else.

Not wearing the shoes inside the apartment, fixing the bed, replying to texts, saying three daily gratitudes before going to bed, these are just a few examples of small changes I made but have probably paid off in bigger ways as each new shift in attitude opens us up more.

10. It’s Still a Relationship
Some of what I’ve said likely applies to any relationship. Probably just about any good relationship advice will have some merit regardless of culture with a little flexibility and tweaking. Going full circle, being in a cross-cultural relationship is an opportunity a means to better understand ourselves in another context, not some daunting hurdle unless we make it that way.

11. Don’t be an Ass
Eat the lechon (the roasted pork in the video from the first part). Don’t be overly dramatic about the differences. Be open. Be supportive. Be cool. And things will be better.

In Summary
Having a cross-cultural relationship has been worth it for me. What I’d encourage anyone reading this is as with most my blog posts to recognize the nuances, the opportunities, the challenges, that like most things there are no easy answers but answers that need to be made nevertheless. I’m sure as our relationship continues, as more changes come I’ll find even more lessons learned and things to share, but for now I think this is a pretty good summary of it.

Sunday, March 24, 2019

A Talk about my Cross-Cultural Relationship

A Talk about my Cross-Cultural Relationship
A little over three years after dating my girlfriend, I proposed to her last Christmas Eve, our wedding planned for later this year. We had a few advantages when it came to knowing about each other’s cultures, I spent three years in the Philippines as a Peace Corps Volunteer, the third year spent working with our predominately Filipino staff in working with American volunteers and of course helping train new volunteers in how to work and live in the Philippines. On her end, she was a staff member for the Peace Corps for about three years (after I finished my service), working with Americans every day for a U.S. Government Agency.

This isn’t a blog post about the entirety of our relationship, about our individual personalities, aspirations, struggles, and so on, but instead a focus on what cultural differences both made our relationship easier and more difficult.

A Bad Example
I am not a fan of 90 Day Fiancee. I find the show cringe-worthy and exploitive. However, I can’t deny that it has good examples of what can go wrong with relationships across cultures, and this clip in particular… there’s a lot to breakdown.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X91V5h8VbV8

Part of my work in my third year in the Peace Corps was to help provide the perspective of an American volunteer when a volunteer issue came up. As an example, it was common that volunteers felt their host agency didn’t care about their work. The reason was usually a cultural misunderstanding, we’re very stressed about deadlines, punctuality, and getting things done quickly in the States. In the Philippines most people are more relaxed. Things will get done, it’s not a big deal if it gets delayed. That can come across as ‘not caring’ though a more accurate description is they’re ‘less urgent’. That’s what I’ll be doing here. Of course, as Larry isn’t a Peace Corps Volunteer, hasn’t had any cultural orientation, so my standards will be lower for him.

Objective Information
-Lechon, the roasted pig, is expensive. It is not normal dining but is instead used for special occasions or big events.
-Food is a big part of the Philippines culturally. It’s not just a time to eat, it’s a time to socialize, to bond, people drop what they’re doing when it’s time to eat. It’s something most Filipinos take a lot of pride in.
-Filipinos also tend to be very good at non-verbal communication. One of my own struggles early on during my service was realizing that sometimes people disagreed with me but were too polite to say it straight to my face.  I had to learn to better read the subtler hints. Although the family might not have known why Larry had such a problem with the Lechon, they were very aware of his non-verbal clues from his facial expressions, to hand gestures, to overall demeanor.
-Lechon is roasted pork. We eat roasted pork in the States, even if we do it differently.

What I Find Understandable
-The first glimpse of dirt roads, carabao on the side of the road, cinderblock houses, and so on can be an initial culture shock. Things are different, there’s a lot to take in at once. This added with meeting your fiancĂ©’s family for the first time can be stressful.
-In America, we have issues with seeing our meat as the animals they came from. Seeing a head on a cooked animal is something that can be upsetting to the un-initiated.
-He seemingly didn’t know the importance of food culture, nor how expensive the lechon was.

What I Find Wrong
-He didn’t even want to try it and let himself get so weirded out so easily that he didn’t give the food an honest try. As mentioned above, it’s pork, not something a bit more different for us Americans like balot.
-It’s hard to figure out what differences we have culturally until it happens, but I still get the sense that there was very little research or conversations prior to this scene. There didn’t seem to be a lot of effort done beforehand.
-He acted like the family couldn’t tell how he felt, as if they were clueless foreigners who didn’t understand what he was doing. They didn’t get why he was being so childish, but they could see that he was just as clearly as those of us watching the video.

There’s a lot going on from the “Colonial Mindset” of the family, feeling the need to get an expensive meal for the American guest. There’s the perception of cultural obstacles where a simple task like eating lunch can feel like a giant hurdle, which can be both serious and ridiculous (and both at the same time). There’s the power dynamics where the American man feels that being a temporary guest is just as difficult if not more so than the Filipina expected to move to another country. These nuances I feel get lost in the show in favor for the drama of the moment.

A Reputation Earned… and Complications
Before diving into some of the details about Tin and my relationship, I feel it’s important to talk about some of the stereotypes, and other realities when it comes to relationships between Filipinos and foreigners. As a warning, this section will contain some mature and unpleasant topics such as large age gaps between couples and prostitution. If you want to skip this, go to the next section below.

There is a reputation of Western men getting Asian trophy wives, and there is truth in it. Spending three years in the Philippines I saw this play out in different ways. I was encouraged to date in my community, people wanted me to be happy and find someone. There was a genuine compliment when I was told by some people in my host community that they wanted me to find a good wife and settle down in the Philippines. It was their way of saying that I’m welcome. There was also a less genuine, less heart-warming compliment when some of the more machisimo-driven men asking me not “if” I had a girlfriend, but “how many” girlfriends I had.

I saw Peace Corps Volunteers or various ages, both men and women, date locals, some leading to marriage and others not. On the other hand I saw male volunteers frustrated by and female volunteers afraid of unwanted attention and advances. I met foreigners who were dating a Filipino or Filipina love the Philippines as a country, and those who dismissed it as ‘third world’ and beneath them. I saw old men with women young enough to be their daughters, even granddaughters. A trio of old men I ran into once it turned out had bought their girlfriends out of prostitution and were putting them through school… and also kept them as their girlfriends. I also saw the men in the red light district of all ages, from different countries, comes to the Philippines for sex. As I walked through that place trying to get from Point A to Point B, I had to ignore or decline the men walking up to with laminated menus saying, “Fresh girls!” as if they were meat at a grocery store.

How much older is too older? What if there is encouragement from the Filipino or Filipina’s family? Is the fact that the trio above was putting the girls through school absolve them of some guilt? If a foreigner is awkward in his or her own country and finds someone in another country who doesn’t care or doesn’t see that awkwardness as harshly, does it cheapen the relationship, make it less sincere? These are not rhetorical questions, they are things that help shape our values, our opinions about this matter, but in many cases the answers aren’t clear.

For Tin and I, we each have insecurities to overcome, to deal with others’ perceptions. For me, I like to include that Tin has her own Masters degree when I talk about her, to include her work with American Volunteers to avoid the stereotype that I went to Asia to find a domestic housewife. For her, she prefers to pay for our meals when out so it doesn’t appear that she’s just in the relationship for the money.

Degrees, Priorities, and Definitions
I’m not on the “we’re all the same deep down” bandwagon except in the most general of terms. We like to be treated well, we don’t like to be treated unwell, money is nice to have for the things we want, things like that I’ll agree are more universal. I urge caution though to how much we assume are the same as degrees, priorities, and definitions can seem small at first, but can play out in very big ways. Below has some examples of how it’s played out for us.

Degrees
What most Americans would call being forward, most Filipinos would call being abrasive. What most Filipinos would call being hospitable, most Americans would see as going above and beyond. Although we feel the same about these two things, we see them as more or less extreme than one another. A good example with Tin and me is my pessimism. Most Americans who know me think I’m a glowing optimist, see me as glass-half-full. I use humor to downplay situations, I try to find the silver lining in most cases. Optimist.

In the Filipino lens my sarcasm is more biting, less about downplaying a situation and instead pointing it out and highlighting it. Same with finding a silver lining, it comes across as having to force myself to find some good when the good should already be apparent. Pessimist. One of the things I had to accept in our relationship was that my own self-perception as being a positive person wasn’t as universally “True” as I thought it was and was instead “true” in my own cultural context.

Priorities
We all would like to have high-paying jobs that are fulfilling while we spend quality time with family, friends, and loved ones. Will you take that next step in your career if it means moving away from your family? Will you accept a job that pays twice as much if it’s boring and not something you’re interested in? If you have a cousin needing a medical surgery, how much would you give? Would it be a gift or a loan? Our more universal wants are rarely so kind as to offer themselves in equal amounts, and so we have to prioritize.

For Tin and I, it plays out in our planning. When I’m listing my top wants, it’s a second Masters, paying off any remaining debt I have. For Tin, though career aspirations are there, there is also more on her list such as helping her family meet their goals. It is not that we Americans don’t care about family, or that Filipinos don’t have career aspirations. It’s just that when making a list the average American is going to put career above family, and vice versa. Part of our relationship has been working through this, and I assume we will continue to as opportunities come our way.

Definitions
As I’ve stated in other blog posts, often the most important things to us like love, patriotism, and morality can be very broad and diverse in how we define them. This is true within our own culture and is only exacerbated when looking across different cultures. One small example is “flirting” and “teasing” are switched around from American-English and Filipino-English. In America, in general flirting is the more innocent of the two while in the Philippines it’s teasing that is considered the lighter term. Suffice to say that was something we learned when talking about whether another guy or girl was casually flirting or teasing with one of us.

One of the things I had to redefine was holidays. This is one that’s a bit more murky to me on what’s cultural and not, but I do find that at least some holidays are held more important, more sentimental in the Philippines than America. Certainly not the case for all holidays and all people of our respective cultures, but was for the two of us. Before our relationship I had slowly let holidays become “another day of the year”, when for Tin they were times to really put that extra effort, to show our care in celebration. I had to learn to re-define my view of holidays to better match hers.

Socio-Economic, Political, and Techno-Geographical Considerations
We are not isolated islands drifting in the seas of everyday life. We’re all inter-connected, we’re affected by our environments, we play by society’s rules both implicit and explicit (or struggle against said rules). Here are a few things that I found affected our relationship beyond our control.


Socio-Economic
The Philippines has a weak currency compared to the U.S. You can live in the Philippines for a lot, lot cheaper than you can in the United States if you compare things by the exchange rate. My fiancée as a Peace Corps staff member made less than minimum wage in America, but not only was she able to live well in the Philippines, but also was able to save money, invest, and help send a little to support her family.

When I was unemployed for the whole of 2017, the conversation came up that maybe I should move to the Philippines, find a job there, and let Tin be the breadwinner. The biggest hurdle to that financially were my student loan payments. What I pay monthly for my loans is maybe a fifth or sixth of the money I take home each month (after taxes), but would’ve been either everything or more than everything I earned from some of the job prospects I saw over there, earning a Filipino wage.

We know an Australian and Filipina couple who ultimately decided to live in Australia for at least awhile because it is so much easier to save in a country with a strong currency and move to the country with a weaker currency down the road than the other way around. It’s the situation we find ourselves in as well.

Political
Thank goodness the U.S. and Philippines gets along, I’d rather not imagine the hoops and hurdles that couples from less-friendly countries have to go through. Still, there are legal hurdles and barriers. One hurdle of course is immigration paperwork. As of now, Tin can stay in America up to six months at a time as a tourist. However, she can’t work in the States until we get through the proper legal channels. One barrier is that whereas she can get a dual citizenship eventually (three years after getting the green card I believe), I cannot get a Filipino citizenship without renouncing my own.

Depending on the countries, the situations, etc. it can make everything easier or harder, shorter or longer, open up certain doors and close others.

Techno-Geographic
I’m pretty sure I’m making this term up, but I find it fitting to include technology and geography together as in our relationship they are intertwined. We didn’t date until about a year after I left the Philippines. She was attending a training in Washington D.C. on how to be a “Sexual Assault Response Liaison” as part of the Peace Corps’ attempts to better handle the prevention of and support for assault cases, and Tin asked if I’d meet her there as it was her first time in the States. In the end I didn’t meet her there, I had my own Masters class to go to, it was a long, expensive trip from Colorado, and I wouldn’t see her all that much. Instead, I invited her to come to Colorado sometime and she took me up on it.

We’ve been in a long-distance relationship, but with technology from Skype, to Facebook, to Viber we were able to talk almost every day. We’ve been together in person several times over three years, yet we’ve never had an anniversary together. Instead we found a meal we could both cook and cooked it “together”. It’s not the same as cooking together in person (which we’ve done on other days), but with technology we can get closer, to share moments in ways that people couldn’t before the technological innovations we have today.

Conclusions and Part Two
Much of this post is generalized as depending on the cultures we come from, and what aspects of our respective cultures we adhere to more than not, will affect what the specific barriers and doors between us there are. That is the point though, that what has worked for us, will not be the same that will work for others. Part Two will focus on a list of tips for cross-cultural relationships with explanations and examples.

Friday, January 11, 2019

A Discussion About Bureaucracy


A Discussion About Bureaucracy
With yet another government shutdown, and the fact that right now (and for the foreseeable future) I am a bureaucrat, I thought I’d share a few thoughts on the profession that covers my criticisms, praises, and a few other tidbits.

Of course, as is usual for my posts the first thing to do is DEFINE what the bureaucracy is. For the sake of communication, I’ll be using two similar, but distinct terms:

Bureaucrat/Bureaucracy: Any government employee who is not elected. This is a very broad definition that includes everything from police, to auditors, to military, to social workers. Even teachers, the people fixing our roads, and postal workers count.
Administrators/Administration: This covers the more traditional “bureaucrats” of white-collar, office workers who deal with the paperwork (red tape), regulations (rules), and other office-type functions.

The bureaucracy at its essence is meant to implement government. Let’s take Trump’s wall as an example. He will not build it nor will anyone in Congress. That’s not their job. Should it be funded and approved, the bureaucracy will build it. Administrators will put it out to bid (or likely several bids for different aspects and locations of the wall) to contractors, will do the accounting, deal with any legal matters such as land use and ownership, international agreements with Mexico, environmental impacts, etc. They will handle the logistics of transportation, procuring materials, human resources to oversee and support those who construct the wall, and so on. If done correctly, there will also be people monitoring and evaluating the project to ensure that nothing is amiss and things go on schedule. Engineers, architects, builders, electricians, security personnel, lawyers, drivers, heavy equipment operators, and office personnel are just a handful of the roles needed to make policy a reality.

The Underlying Challenges
Bureaucracy is not democracy. As someone who did my Masters in Public Administration, that is working as a bureaucrat (and administrator) on the local level, I will be one of the first to admit that bureaucrats are not inherently representative of the people. That’s not to say that bureaucrats are inherently against the public’s will, only that we work off of a different set of priorities. Bureaucrats have their agency/government’s mission, they have their assigned roles, they have their expertise/research.

As an example, an Environmentalist working for the EPA is going to be working under the agency’s mission of environmental protection, the project/programs they’ve been assigned, and whatever findings/conclusions they make based off of their education and what they find in the field. A police officer has their mission to serve and protect, they have their jurisdiction, they have their training/evaluation of the moment to decide what to do. The public’s sway over these bureaucrats is indirect. The EPA gains more or less funding through Congress, policies are changed by the political-appointee Secretary. The public elects officials who will then change the laws that police officers enforce. However, there is no vote of the people on what the environmentalist is going to include in his climate change report, nor is there ballot for people to decide if the police officer will give someone a ticket or if she’ll give them a warning. It wouldn’t be efficient, and in many cases we prefer to rely on the expert/bureaucrat to do their job objectively despite public opinion.

The government cannot be avoided. Whereas politicians can be voted in and out, the public has less at their disposal to deal with bureaucrats and can feel powerless. This is exacerbated by the fact that bureaucrats do their respective job for a living. The Planner lives and breathes land use, zoning, building applications. The Clerk has easy access to local ordinances and the Town Charter. The Department of Transportation has access to charts, graphs, numbers, budgets, maps, and far more. It’s an imbalance of power so when someone wants to build something the Planner says doesn’t comply with current zoning, when the Clerk tells the home owner that the grass in their yard is too high, when the project manager says that the bridge has to be put in a certain location despite local complaints, it’s a tough position for the citizen(s). Of course, that’s where politicians come in, and citizens can leverage the politicians who in turn can direct the bureaucrats. However, in those cases it’s the politicians who saved the day, the bureaucrats the foe that was stopped.

For the most part, bureaucrats DEAL WITH PROBLEMS. There’s a pot hole. There is crime. There is a fire. The air isn’t clean enough. A foreign power has declared war on us. Therefore, when bureaucrats do their job, life goes on as usual and the problem goes unnoticed. When they don’t do their job, or when they are needed, we see the inconvenience however large or small clearly.

All of the above applies to the best of circumstances. The most benevolent, brilliant, effective bureaucracy must contend with its undemocratic, power-differential, inconveniently visible nature, all of which create understandable friction with the greater public. As is a trend with my posts, we don’t live in the best of circumstances and human and institutional flaws add onto the problems of bureaucracy.

The Criticisms
The last section, despite listing hardships, are not criticisms. I feel they are necessary and mostly unavoidable obstacles. Here though I’ll list out what (from my brief experience) are things that in general I find bureaucratic culture could improve on. This of course doesn’t characterize every agency, every town, every person, but are things I’ve seen common enough to see a trend.

1)      The Desire to be Understood before Understanding: Bureaucrats, despite rumors, really are just people. Just as every day citizens struggle to communicate with bureaucrats the nuance of their situation, how the study is missing something only locals know about, so too do bureaucrats struggle to communicate how they’ve really tried to find a viable alternative, and how the consequences of not doing a project or program will be more harmful than it appears on the surface level. I took a training last year specifically on how to work with the public on public projects, and when asked what their main reason was being there, over half of the administrators in attendance stated “to help the public understand them”.

As an alternative, as bureaucrats I think we’re in a better position to understand first. Listen before we speak, hear what the citizens say before we put the final signature in a report. This is often easier said than done, but one that can go a long way in building trust.

2)       Intellectual Arrogance: Bureaucrats, and administrators in particular, do have a bad habit of thinking just because we are the expert that means we’re right. In many cases it’s true, but not always, and even if we are that doesn’t mean that citizens don’t have ideas of tweaks or small changes that can’t be used. And as stated before, expertise is not democracy, it is one piece of the puzzle. It is all right if the people choose a less efficient, more culturally acceptable solution now and then.

As an alternative, I think being one piece of the puzzle” is a better mindset. As an example, one of my projects is to research municipal broadband for my small town, to see what options exist, their costs, their benefits, etc. Rather than see this as my project to decide what the town will do, it is my job to give them the best information so they can make an informed decision.

3)       Assumption of Objectivity: As mentioned above, we most of the time want our bureaucrats to be objective. It helps to have at least a degree of fairness and predictability in our institutions. However, from my experience is that this objectivity is far too often assumed, believed to be inherent when it is not. We live in a complicated world and certain “objective” standards will have unintended subjective consequences. Gentrification is probably the most famous example, where standards like high crime and low economic output are used as an excuse to drive current residents out and rebuild anew with little if any regard to other factors like race, poverty, and social status. So too do we often withhold help to rural, less-dense population areas for more concentrated-urban development when the former may actually have the greater need.

My alternative is to recognize and accept that some level of subjective decision-making exists in our work no matter how hard we try otherwise, and to be honest in pointing it out. To take it a step forward, I’d also encourage being willing to look and see whether the subjective decisions and assumptions in any given project, program, or policy can be mitigated or even resolved.

The Praise
1.       Solving Problems: As stated above, the bureaucracy is meant to solve problems even though its reputation is the opposite. Let’s look at a few classic examples.

The IRS is many people’s least favorite agency as it deals with most of our least favorite interaction with government; paying taxes. We watch on as a large chunk of our paycheck each pay period gets removed and thrown into the ether of government save for social security and medicare that get listed specifically when taken from us. However, someone has to collect taxes. Someone has to ensure that the government is funded. Whether we agree with all government expenditures or not, the IRS is the agency that fixes the problem of taking citizen’s money so that it can go into roads, traffic signals, clean water, and yes, even that program you disagree with.

The DMV is notorious for long lines, lots of paperwork, and overall just being frustrating in general. However, vehicles are both the source of many needs in our society as well as many problems. Driver’s licenses are our most common form of identification, it is crucial to law enforcement, there are environmental concerns, we  want mechanisms to deal with unsafe drivers.

Whether we agree with the existence of the EPA, SOMEONE should be ensuring that our rivers aren’t poisoned. Whether we think the Department of Energy should exist, we need to keep an eye on nuclear power. Even if we say that Education is a state matter, it is still to state bureaucrats to help educate our children. These aren’t profit-making activities for the private sector to grow off of, and I do praise bureaucrats for taking the problems on.

2.       Choosing the Best, Imperfect Solution: Whatever level of government, whatever size or scope of the work, there will be those who are helped and hurt. The new road pattern that will save a million drivers 15-30 minutes on their commute will force a handful of business no longer easily accessed to move or close down. The program that will help thousands of people get back on their feet will be an extra tax burden on those who don’t. And of course, there’s all of those NIMBY (not in my back yard) issues such as where to put a prison, chicken farm, industrial park, and other vital but not attractive services and institutions.

There are no perfect solutions, and I commend other administrators for making (and hopefully owning up to) those hard choices. Someone has to make them, because no decision holds just as many consequences if not more.

3.       Citizens instead of Customers: Citizens are not the same as customers. Customers can be gained and lost, there is a more natural relationship of a mutual exchange. The customer wants something and pays a price for the good or service. Government isn’t so clear cut. Unhappy people are still citizens. People who hold fundamental differences with an agency’s mission are still citizens. People are citizens by mandate, and it creates a much different dynamic.

This is not to suggest it is superior over private sector priorities with customers, only that I recognize and appreciate that the bureaucrats and administrators don’t look to fill a niche, but instead look to serve all the people, at least in theory.

The Point
This is less about trying to drive home a specific point, and more to share a few of my experiences, observations, and opinions to hopefully fill in some holes. I think at a time when at least Federal bureaucrats are political bargaining chips (regardless of who you want to blame), it can only help to share more about who these professionals are, and what purpose they serve.

***

ACTION!
Honestly, I’ll be content if anyone who reads this can think twice before believing the bureaucracy is just red tape meant to stifle good people. There are many, many legitimate criticisms, but recognizing the functions they perform (or at least are supposed to perform) can make our critiques more focused and useful than shut this agency down or that agency down.

***

What’s Next?
I’ll be working on describing my cross-cultural relationship to my now-fiancee, discussing some of the things that I think does add onto the already-complicated-dynamics of a relationship. I might do a re-write on earlier posts I made about how I feel we handle racism in America since some things have changed (and many other things haven’t). One other idea I’m toying with is applying the 10 Strategies of Political and Social Conversations I’ve done to some of the current debates, to see how they hold up.